Community consultation occurred between 24 July 2023 and 31 August 2023

  • 6921 people viewed the project page

  • 1513 survey responses were received

  • 516 people downloaded the policy documents

  • 114 Project followers

Survey results

Breakdown of respondents

Please note: 1513 respondents provided an answer for this question, 0 respondents skipped this question.

Note: Respondents could pick multipule answers.

Breakdown of respondents

What suburb do you live in?

Please note: 1423 respondents provided an answer for this question, 90 respondents skipped this question.

Suburbs of respondents

In the past 2 years, how often have you visited and used the following Outdoor spaces and destinations?

Please note: 1480 respondents provided an answer for this question, 33 respondents skipped this question.

When do you usually go to outdoor trading destinations?

Please note: 1501 respondents provided an answer for this question, 12 respondents skipped this question.

Respondents could pick multipule answers.

When do you usually go to outdoor trading destinations?

Do you agree with the new draft framework for outdoor trading which proposes to allow businesses to install parklets on a more permanent basis?

Please note: 1484 respondents provided an answer for this question, 29 respondents skipped this question.

Do you agree with the new draft framework for outdoor trading which proposes to allow businesses to install parklets on a more permanent basis?

The draft framework for outdoor trading proposes that businesses should cover the costs to design, install and maintain parklets in public spaces for commercial benefit. Do you agree?

Please note: 1487 respondents provided an answer for this question, 26 respondents skipped this question.

The draft framework for outdoor trading proposes that businesses should cover the costs to design, install and maintain parklets in public spaces for commercial benefit. Do you agree?

Do you have any feedback on the draft framework for outdoor trading in relation to parklets?

Please note: 916 respondents provided an answer for this question, 597 respondents skipped this question.

Top themes

  • Visual appeal/impact

  • Safety

  • Accessibility

  • Costs

Please indicate your level of support with the following long-term options for the Pier Street Feature site:

Please note: 1485 respondents provided an answer for this question, 28 respondents skipped this question.

Level of support with the following long-term options for the Pier Street Feature site:

Do you have other feedback in relation to the Pier Street Feature Site?

Please note: 675 respondents provided an answer for this question, 838 respondents skipped this question.

Top themes

  • Keep the feature site

  • Placemaking

  • Traffic

  • Parking

Do you have any comments on the Pier St precinct beyond the feature site?

Please note: 276 respondents provided an answer for this question, 1237 respondents skipped this question.

Top themes

  • Traffic

  • Accessibility

  • Parking

  • Placemaking

Do you support the draft fixed infrastructure guidelines that aim to allow businesses to install low risk fixed infrastructure?

Please note: 1433 respondents provided an answer for this question, 80 respondents skipped this question.

Do you support the draft fixed infrastructure guidelines that aim to allow businesses to install low risk fixed infrastructure?

Do you have other feedback in relation to draft fixed infrastructure guidelines

Please note: 301 respondents provided an answer for this question, 1212 respondents skipped this question.

Top themes

  • Accessibility

  • Costs

  • Visual appeal/impacts

  • Parking

Do you have any other comments on the draft Outdoor Dining Framework?

Please note: 426 respondents provided an answer for this question, 1087 respondents skipped this question.

Top themes

  • Maintenance

  • Accessibility

  • Costs

  • Visual appeal/impacts